Are All of New York's Students Learning to Read?
The National Assessment of Educational Progress's data is far more damning than the New York Education Department's:
ALL GRAPHS CREATED USING DATA FROM NYSED
Why do we focus on 3rd-grade reading levels?
Third-grade reading proficiency is the single most important indicator of a student's educational progress and the likelihood of academic success. Children who have not mastered reading by that point are educationally disadvantaged for a lifetime. Without remediation, they are unlikely to optimally benefit from their education or become all they could be in life. An estimated 70% of below-proficient third graders are likely to graduate from high school unprepared for college or drop out of school entirely.
Explore the Economic Cost of Failure to Teach Reading:
- Compare your school district's capacity to teach reading
- Find out how many dropouts and unprepared graduates at your school
- What's your school district's stake in the school-to-prison pipeline?
What's the Economic Cost of Failure to Teach Reading?1. Find out the economic cost to taxpayers of failure to teach reading for YOUR school district at the Education Consumers Foundation:
|
How Well Does Your District Teach Reading?2. Compare YOUR district with others in your county & see how well your school remediates literacy on the Grade Progression charts at Literacy Advocates Github:
|
Speak Up for Literacy New York!
The National Reading Panel identified five key concepts at the core of every effective reading instruction program: Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Vocabulary, and Comprehension. In addition, instruction programs should be explicit, systematic, and well planned (structured literacy).
Yet, the literacy programs used by most schools’ lack many of these components, and the reading outcomes that they produce are disastrous.
Be a steward of your district's children and tax dollars: advocate for screening to identify at-risk students, early intervention, and teacher training in tested and proven reading instruction (structured literacy). Ensure that ALL students receive explicit, systematic, and cumulative reading instruction and develop the foundational skills to become skilled readers. Join us and advocate for public education and an educated public.
Why use 3rd-grade data?
Third-grade reading proficiency is the single most important indicator of a student's educational progress and the likelihood of academic success. Children who have not mastered reading by that point are educationally disadvantaged for a lifetime. Without remediation, they are unlikely to optimally benefit from their education or become all they could be in life. An estimated 70% of below-proficient third graders are likely to graduate from high school unprepared for college or drop out of school entirely.
How well are New York's children taught to read?
According to pre-COVID 2019 NYSED third to eighth-grade students' data, 51% of native English-speaking students and 55% of all students read below grade level (i.e., below the "proficient" level). Appallingly, 65% of African American/Black students,84% of children in foster care, and 88% of students with disabilities cannot read to a proficient level or are functionally illiterate. That said, 95% of ALL students have the potential to become skilled readers and read at or above grade level if they receive effective Pre-K to 3nd-grade instruction--i.e., instruction containing phonological awareness, phonemes, phonics, and building fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.
What's the overall impact of Illiteracy?
Illiteracy costs New York taxpayers an estimated 3-billion dollars per year.
Three out of four people on public assistance have weak literacy skills. 80% of people in prison have inadequate literacy skills, 40% of people in prison have dyslexia and 80% of youths brought before courts have weak literacy skills.
Literacy is essential to becoming a full member of society. Children who do not learn to read and write well without remediation are destined to become socially and economically disenfranchised.
Why are children missing foundational skills?
Tested and proven reading instruction has been available for decades, so why are children missing foundational reading skills?New York is one of the remaining 20 states to lack basic literacy laws such as screenings for risk of dyslexia. Neither are teacher trainers required to disseminate science-based reading instruction strategies. Furthermore, one of New York's most popular reading programs is a now-discredited "three-cueing" method of reading instruction—a form of reading instruction employed by at least a third of the U.S. educational market.
Three-cueing prompts students to "guess" unknown words by looking at cues such as pictures or phrases in the text rather than sound them out using phonics—it promotes a strategy used by struggling readers. But, ultimately, it results in children failing to learn how to decode words by looking at the print—a significant impediment to understanding more advanced texts and acquiring vocabulary.
Furthermore, instructing students to guess words (rather than decode) is biased against underprivileged students who often lack a rich background knowledge due to less exposure to travel, museums, out-of-school clubs, and camps.
Furthermore, instructing students to guess words (rather than decode) is biased against underprivileged students who often lack a rich background knowledge due to less exposure to travel, museums, out-of-school clubs, and camps. This since-disproven theory teaches strategies commonly used by struggling readers, and the cueing system fails once the content becomes more complex and there are no pictures. As a result, some education departments have banned the program from schools.
What's the solution?
New York needs general and special education teachers trained in structured literacy programs, i.e., following reading science principles established by the National Reading Panel in 1998. To fully understand how the reading brain works and teach reading effectively requires at least sixty hours of professional development. Special education teachers need to complete a practicum and more than six hours of expert mentoring. Furthermore, early screening and early literacy intervention prevent 95% of students from experiencing learning loss and associated trauma. The State also needs to discontinue funding for and dissemination of unproven and disproven teaching methodologies by publicly funded institutions. These include but are not limited to Reading Recovery, Leveled Literacy Intervention, Fountas & Pinnell, and Lucy Calkins Units of Study. Reading science clarifies that far more effective alternatives are available but not effectively used in the classroom. With demonstrably effective structured literacy instruction, a vastly larger percentage of N.Y.'s children can emerge from their schooling on grade level or above and ready for college or the workplace.
Our request:
We respectfully demand that New York State discontinues funding for and dissemination of unproven and disproven teaching methodologies by publicly funded institutions. We respectfully demand the complete removal of balanced literacy, including but not limited to Reading Recovery, Leveled Literacy Intervention, Fountas & Pinnell, and Lucy Calkins Units of Study for all students with disabilities and general education students from first to third grade. The scientific evidence shows that programs that use balanced literacy negatively impact our children.
We implore public school representatives to safeguard student’s academic progress, and the district’s fiscal responsibility to taxpayers by investing in teacher training and mentoring. Teachers need to explicitly teach literacy foundational skills to all students, and instruct students with dyslexia with the intensity that they need.
Evidence confirms that 95% of ALL children can learn to read, WITH explicit, systematic, structured literacy to grade level (proficient) or above.
Yet, the literacy programs used by most schools’ lack many of these components, and the reading outcomes that they produce are disastrous.
Be a steward of your district's children and tax dollars: advocate for screening to identify at-risk students, early intervention, and teacher training in tested and proven reading instruction (structured literacy). Ensure that ALL students receive explicit, systematic, and cumulative reading instruction and develop the foundational skills to become skilled readers. Join us and advocate for public education and an educated public.
Why use 3rd-grade data?
Third-grade reading proficiency is the single most important indicator of a student's educational progress and the likelihood of academic success. Children who have not mastered reading by that point are educationally disadvantaged for a lifetime. Without remediation, they are unlikely to optimally benefit from their education or become all they could be in life. An estimated 70% of below-proficient third graders are likely to graduate from high school unprepared for college or drop out of school entirely.
How well are New York's children taught to read?
According to pre-COVID 2019 NYSED third to eighth-grade students' data, 51% of native English-speaking students and 55% of all students read below grade level (i.e., below the "proficient" level). Appallingly, 65% of African American/Black students,84% of children in foster care, and 88% of students with disabilities cannot read to a proficient level or are functionally illiterate. That said, 95% of ALL students have the potential to become skilled readers and read at or above grade level if they receive effective Pre-K to 3nd-grade instruction--i.e., instruction containing phonological awareness, phonemes, phonics, and building fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.
What's the overall impact of Illiteracy?
Illiteracy costs New York taxpayers an estimated 3-billion dollars per year.
Three out of four people on public assistance have weak literacy skills. 80% of people in prison have inadequate literacy skills, 40% of people in prison have dyslexia and 80% of youths brought before courts have weak literacy skills.
Literacy is essential to becoming a full member of society. Children who do not learn to read and write well without remediation are destined to become socially and economically disenfranchised.
Why are children missing foundational skills?
Tested and proven reading instruction has been available for decades, so why are children missing foundational reading skills?New York is one of the remaining 20 states to lack basic literacy laws such as screenings for risk of dyslexia. Neither are teacher trainers required to disseminate science-based reading instruction strategies. Furthermore, one of New York's most popular reading programs is a now-discredited "three-cueing" method of reading instruction—a form of reading instruction employed by at least a third of the U.S. educational market.
Three-cueing prompts students to "guess" unknown words by looking at cues such as pictures or phrases in the text rather than sound them out using phonics—it promotes a strategy used by struggling readers. But, ultimately, it results in children failing to learn how to decode words by looking at the print—a significant impediment to understanding more advanced texts and acquiring vocabulary.
Furthermore, instructing students to guess words (rather than decode) is biased against underprivileged students who often lack a rich background knowledge due to less exposure to travel, museums, out-of-school clubs, and camps.
Furthermore, instructing students to guess words (rather than decode) is biased against underprivileged students who often lack a rich background knowledge due to less exposure to travel, museums, out-of-school clubs, and camps. This since-disproven theory teaches strategies commonly used by struggling readers, and the cueing system fails once the content becomes more complex and there are no pictures. As a result, some education departments have banned the program from schools.
What's the solution?
New York needs general and special education teachers trained in structured literacy programs, i.e., following reading science principles established by the National Reading Panel in 1998. To fully understand how the reading brain works and teach reading effectively requires at least sixty hours of professional development. Special education teachers need to complete a practicum and more than six hours of expert mentoring. Furthermore, early screening and early literacy intervention prevent 95% of students from experiencing learning loss and associated trauma. The State also needs to discontinue funding for and dissemination of unproven and disproven teaching methodologies by publicly funded institutions. These include but are not limited to Reading Recovery, Leveled Literacy Intervention, Fountas & Pinnell, and Lucy Calkins Units of Study. Reading science clarifies that far more effective alternatives are available but not effectively used in the classroom. With demonstrably effective structured literacy instruction, a vastly larger percentage of N.Y.'s children can emerge from their schooling on grade level or above and ready for college or the workplace.
Our request:
We respectfully demand that New York State discontinues funding for and dissemination of unproven and disproven teaching methodologies by publicly funded institutions. We respectfully demand the complete removal of balanced literacy, including but not limited to Reading Recovery, Leveled Literacy Intervention, Fountas & Pinnell, and Lucy Calkins Units of Study for all students with disabilities and general education students from first to third grade. The scientific evidence shows that programs that use balanced literacy negatively impact our children.
We implore public school representatives to safeguard student’s academic progress, and the district’s fiscal responsibility to taxpayers by investing in teacher training and mentoring. Teachers need to explicitly teach literacy foundational skills to all students, and instruct students with dyslexia with the intensity that they need.
Evidence confirms that 95% of ALL children can learn to read, WITH explicit, systematic, structured literacy to grade level (proficient) or above.
Bar Charts of Reading Levels for Native English Speaking Students by County, School District & Individual School
|
|
We represent students in crisis to advocate for services that reduce barriers to receiving a free adequate public education
Support Us with a Donation
|
|
Dyslexia Advocacy Action Group is a 501c3 registered charity #47 33 27
©2015 Dyslexia Advocacy Action Group, New York. All Rights Reserved.